Epic Showdown: MVP Ion vs Infinite Discs Tomb – World Series of Putters Round 1
Today, Alan and I went over to the softball field at Willow Park to test out his newest Distance Drivers. It was both encouraging and discouraging. We are, at best, intermediate disc golfers — but my distance throwing only occasionally showed any signs of intermediate ability. Let’s just blame it on the early morning.
Our goal was simple: to test consistency, flight, and control — just as in the MVP Ion vs Infinite Discs Tomb. matchup. We set up a series of cones in an arc from a launch pad and went all in for distance, always using the more powerful forehand throw. We threw seven different discs five times each, totaling 70 throws.
MVP Ion
The Ion was the very first disc mold ever produced by MVP Disc Sports when they first launched in 2009. Like all MVP molds, the Ion features their GYRO technology overmold designed to improve all aspects of the flight of the disc.
The Ion is a moderately tall putter mold with a bead along the bottom of the rim. The Ion should fly straight with a moderately overstable finish. It’s shape and flight is quite similar to the Gateway Wizard. I actually almost purchased an Ion instead of a Wizard when I was first shopping for a putter over 10 years ago now.
I may have chosen the Ion if it was available in MVP’s Electron Soft plastic blend at the time, which is what I used today while testing the Ion.
Infinite Discs Tomb
The Infinite Discs Tomb was one of the first disc molds released under the Infinite Discs name. Like all Infinite Discs branded discs, the Tomb is made in California by Innova Champion Discs.
The Tomb is an extremely shallow beaded putter with a flat top that rounds into a very flat, blunt edge along the rim. It is very similar to the Innova Colt and Stud. The Tomb is a straight to overstable flyer that has become a very popular option for a driving putter. Today I used a pair of blank X-out D-Blend Tombs.
Specifications and Flight Numbers
Let’s take a look at some of the specs courtesy of the PDGA and break down the major differences between these two putter molds.
Ion |
Tomb |
| Flight Numbers: 2.5/3/0/1
|
Flight Numbers: 3/4/-0/1
![]() |
|
Max Weight: 174.3gr
Diameter: 21.0cm
Height: 1.9cm
Rim Depth: 1.6cm
Rim Thickness: 1.1cm
Inside Rim Diameter: 18.8cm
Rim Depth / Diameter Ratio: 7.6%
Rim Configuration: 62.50
Flexibility: 2.83kg
|
Max Weight: 176.8gr
Diameter: 21.3cm
Height: 1.6cm
Rim Depth: 1.3cm
Rim Thickness: 1.1cm
Inside Rim Diameter: 19.1cm
Rim Depth / Diameter Ratio: 6.1%
Rim Configuration: 65.50
Flexibility: 7.60kg
|

The Match
For more info on the format and scoring system I used to test these putters against each other, be sure to check out our main World Series of Putters post.
(7) Ion Scorecard |
(10) Tomb Scorecard |
| 20ft: Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (10/10 putts made)=30 points |
20ft: N N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y (7/10)=21 points
|
| 30ft: Y Y N Y N Y N N N Y (5/10)=20 points |
30ft: N N Y Y Y N Y N Y Y (6/10)=24 points
|
| 40ft: N N Y N N N N N N N (1/10)=5 points |
40ft: N N Y N N N N N N N (1/10)=5 points
|
| Total: 55 points |
Total: 50 points
|
The Winner
Notes from the Match
It was a solid night of putting for me across the board. Despite such different disc heights that required pretty different grips on the discs, they flew pretty similarly so I was able to stay in a bit of a groove as I went through the match. This one definitely could have gone either way, but I think I did find myself favoring the Ion a bit as the match went on for two main reasons.

